A photography blog covering: Digital, Film, Reviews, History, Cameras, Images, Technique, Stock Photography, and pretty much anything else photography related that comes to mind...with special coverage of Fujifilm X, Nikon, Sony, and Leica cameras.
Friday, October 24, 2014
Hand-hold technique for steadying a long lens
I attended a wedding recently where the wedding photographer, Nichole Haun, used an interesting technique to steady her long, 70-200mm Canon zoom. Back in August I had written a blog post on hand-holding methods for steadying a camera. Nichole's technique was new to me and I asked it she'd mind my passing it along in a blog post. Here are a couple of photos I took of her during the wedding.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
First of all I have to say this site is bookmarked and I read it daily. I love your posts. And, the fact you use an X-T1 is icing on the cake. I love your stock work. I too shoot stock, though more of the landscape, wildlife variety. I don't do lifestyle type work. You have inspired me to shoot still life and that's what I'm starting to work on now.
ReplyDeleteI have a question though -- if you don't mind. I am considering selling my Nikon D800 and other lenses and shooting everything with my X-T1. In the stock business environment is this feasible? Am I limiting myself in sales, present and future? 16 megapixels vs 36.... I would rather shoot with the X but I don't want to stifle sales. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Best,
J
In the current stock photo market it would not make any difference in sales if you shoot with the 16mp sensor. You didn't mention whether you do traditional or micro stock so I will answer for both. Traditional stock agencies require a 50mb file. It takes a 17.5mp sensor to produce a file this size. So working with a camera that produces more than this is not gaining anything, unless you like having the extra resolution to allow cropping. A 16.3mp sensor like the X-T1 and Nikon D4 up-sizes easily to 17.5mp.
DeleteMicro stock size requirements are different. Here the maximum image size can only be what the camera can deliver. The image cannot be up-sized. It used to be that this gave an advantage to larger sized images because download size determined the price. Larger files sold for more. Now both of largest agencies, iStock and Shutterstock, are selling on a subscription model only and size has no bearing on price. So it really doesn't matter what size sensor you use.
For other purposes outside of stock photography, such as making prints, sensor resolution does come into play, and your D800 would be better for making large prints.
That's a bit of an over-simplification, but I think it answers your question. I don't blame you for wanting to shoot with the X-T1. It's a lot more fun and convenient, and, most importantly, the Fuji lenses are really sensational.
Tom,
DeleteThank you very much for taking time from your schedule to respond. I do mostly Microstock work. This helps me tremendously. I always feel like I should be shooting with the D800 instead of the X-T1. Also, without any upsizing at all I have made 24" x 18" from a X-T1 file -- with proper shooting discipline: Tripod, remote, etc, etc. Hanging in my office it looks great (and I'm a pixel peeper at heart)
Thanks again! And keep up the outstanding work and blog posts.
best,
J
I always use triangle tripod technique with my elbow when i holding my 70-200 mm lens
ReplyDelete